Blog
|
|
Posted by Progressive London
|
|
Thursday, 11 March 2010 15:53 |
|
Boris Johnson has broken a key election pledge with his announcement today of huge staff cuts at London Underground that threaten staffing at ticket offices. Although closures of ticket offices may not be limited to outer London stations, these are bound to bear the brunt of any cuts. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Posted by Progressive London
|
|
Thursday, 11 March 2010 12:34 |
|
Visit www.uprise.org.uk to donate UpRise is the legacy of the Rise Festival, an event held annually in London’s Finsbury Park and Europe’s largest anti-racism festival, until the Mayor of London cancelled the event in April 2009. Since the cancellation, the UpRise team have been working to achieve its mission to provide a free music, arts and culture festival; organised by the people and for the people, ensuring that the essence of the historic Rise Festival is kept intact. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Posted by Progressive London
|
|
Tuesday, 09 March 2010 13:24 |
|
by Jenny Jones AM, Green Party Having spent nine years pushing for road safety to be taken seriously by the Met Police, I find that the previous slow incremental improvements are now being reversed with barely a guilty shrug from the Mayor’s office. First, there is a decline of 20 police officers, 5 PCSOs and 5 staff working on road safety. Secondly, cuts to the London Safety Camera Partnership mean the redeployment of 45 police staff, which means it’s a way of letting off 280,000 speeding drivers and red light jumpers who would previously have been sent fines. What is particularly worrying is that this cutback on enforcing the rules of the road is happening at the same time as the Mayor is promoting trials of the naked streets idea and the removal of traffic lights. As much as I have argued for the removal of pedestrian guard rails, I differ from Boris regarding his description of traffic lights as ‘street clutter’. Naked streets are a brilliant idea if done in the right way, with lots of consultation with vulnerable road users, but a 20mph speed limit is normal in the European towns where they have been trialed. Above all, the overseas culture of driving is different. Dutch towns don’t have tens of thousands of uninsured drivers on their streets and unlike Newham, they don’t have to cope with a quarter of road casualties involving a hit and run driver. The idea that eye contact is enough to slow drivers down doesn’t take into account the illegal nature of many drivers who will simply drive off in the event of a collision. |
|
Read more...
|
|
Posted by Progressive London
|
|
Monday, 08 March 2010 16:45 |
After a long flight by campaigners, the Mayor today finally announced the three new Rape Crisis centres he promised during his election campaign nearly two years ago.
Matty Mitford, Spokesperson for the Boris Keep Your Promise Campaign said.
"I'm sure we join all other campaigns for Women in welcoming the new centres, it is a leap forward for vulnerable women in London. Our worry is that, since Boris cut his original funding pledge by 1.6 million, or over half, there is now no clear mention of who will pay for the centre's running costs. They Mayor's funding only lasts for two years, after which who will fund these new centres? With all councils facing huge cuts over the next few years, we could easily find ourselves in the position of having Rape Crisis Centres with no money to run them, all because Boris wouldn't award the money he promised in his manifesto."
David Babbs, Director of Campaigning Organisation 38 Degrees says, "We are glad to show that people-powered campaigning can really work. We will be keeping a close eye on Mayor Johnson to see his original promises are kept. It's the money that matters, not the press release."
Labour's policing spokesperson on the London Assembly, Joanne McCartney AM, said: "While of course this funding is welcome and will hopefully make a real difference, it is overdue and questions still remain about where the rest of the promised money is coming from. Boris Johnson did pledge to act immediately and to provide long-term funding but it's been a long time coming, falls short of the £2.2 million in his manifesto - meaning other organisations are now picking up a greater proportion of the cost of the mayor's pledge - and it's far from clear how sustainable in the long term this financial support is."
|
|
Posted by Progressive London
|
|
Thursday, 04 March 2010 13:29 |
|
Labour respond to reports that Mayor Boris Johnson has written to his disgraced fire authority deputy, Bertha Joseph, for further clarification but STILL refuses to sack her. Labour's leader at City Hall, Len Duvall, said: "Boris has known about this since October, if not before. You have to wonder why it's taking him so long to decide whether someone who spent money intended for children's charities on ball gowns for herself is not fit for office? I understand Boris's reluctance to lose yet another appointment in sleazy circumstances but it's time he did the right thing and removed this councillor from his administration." Bertha Joseph was found to have brought her office into disrepute by Brent council on 13 October 2009. She appealed and, as her appeal was on-going, was appointed by City Hall to the position of deputy chair of London's Fire and Emergency Planning Authority - a position for which she receives £19,000 in allowances. Councillor Joseph lost her appeal on 9 February - almost one month ago - and was suspended from the council for six months. The judge who heard her case criticised her "repeated lack of credibility" and said that, because of her actions, "she surely cannot expect again to serve as Mayor". He also said her actions could have deprived charities of funds. Because of legal loophole, Councillor Joseph's suspension from Brent council does not disbar her from the fire authority unless the Mayor decides she is unfit for office. Despite repeated calls, Boris Johnson still refuses to act. Boris Johnson on Bertha Joseph: 11 February "The legal advice clearly shows there is nothing to prevent Bertha Joseph from serving on the board." Councillor Joseph was found guilty in October 2009 and lost her appeal on 9 February 2010 Later on 11 February “I can’t quite establish from what you’re saying what the charges against this councillor are. If there are legal proceedings to be followed and if there is a suspected crime here then I’m sure that the police will be called in.” 24 February "I understand why you want to attack LFEPA, magnificently chaired as it is, I understand why you want to beat up on Tory councillors but I’m not going to be dragged into making any premature declarations today." |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 38 |