Blog



Speech: Next Steps for Labour - Lisa Nandy MP Print E-mail
Posted by Progressive London   
Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:15

I want to start by thanking Progressive London, Tribune and the CWU for arranging this important debate - a debate we ought to be having across all sections of the party, not just in the PLP.

As a new MP, propelled into politics because of the damage I saw the Tories do to my community in the North West in the 80s and 90s, I believe the Labour Party was, and remains, the best vehicle for social justice  in the UK. And I have been impressed and proud of the progress we have made in government, particularly for children, an issue close to my heart as a former campaigner for The Children's Society.

As a Hammersmith councillor I saw firsthand what the Tories do when they're in power, and while I firmly believe this new right-wing coalition will be every bit as damaging and divisive as predicted, I also believe we on the left have been given a significant opportunity to rethink the assumptions that have underpinned the last 13 years, and reconnect with the 4 million voters, and many members we have lost since 97.

We're a party formed from our grassroots and it is this that still fundamentally marks us out from the others, and this that gives us our strength.  I have felt the  anger of party members about the top-down approach that came to characterise our time in office, and I believe we have made a mistake;  to divide ourselves from the people who live and work in our communities, who knock on doors and listen to the concerns of the electorate day- in, day-out is a problem because it has left us out of touch with the concerns of many of the people we were formed to represent.

That's why I'm so glad to be sharing the platform with Billy, because our link to the wider Labour movement should be our greatest strength in the struggles ahead.

We need a different kind of politics, led by those on the frontline. We need to listen to what people are telling us - that they do not want to live in a society where the gap between rich and poor grows ever wider and - particularly for those on low incomes - where they do not feel rewarded for working hard and trying hard.

I have great hope for the future of the party, as there is clearly an appetite to reflect, learn and renew our sense of purpose. But I am concerned by the view of some, that the way to respond to the insecurity we are hearing on the doorstep about issues like immigration is by perpetuating the solutions that have failed us in the past.

At best we have failed to explain how the immigration system works and failed to delve beneath the concerns people have raised with us to understand what lies behind the insecurity they feel.

And at worst we have used immigration as an excuse for our own social policy failures - nowhere more so than in the area of housing.

It is no surprise then that we are hearing our own language reflected back to us on the doorstep. Instead of legitimising or ignoring those beliefs and assumptions it is time we challenged them.

If we have learned anything in this election it is surely that we must not fall back on the assumptions and myths that have caused the very problems we are now faced with.  Instead we must bravely and urgently confront some of the failures of the new Labour era, nowhere more so than in the area of housing .

To do so is not a betrayal of Labour values, or a rejection of the past - it is to embrace Labour values, and create a vision for future built on the values of hard work, tolerance and fairness that we and the people we represent want to make a reality.

Lisa Nandy was elected in May 2010 as Wigan's first woman MP.

 
Ken Livingstone sets out six points for Labour's post-election debate Print E-mail
Posted by Progressive London   
Monday, 17 May 2010 13:04

Ahead of today's public meeting, Next Steps for Labour, Ken Livingstone sets out six points he wants Labour's post-election debate to focus on:
 
“Labour is at the early stages of assessing how it goes forward.
 
“Here are six points I want Labour to put at the centre of its discussion.
 
“One, Labour must recognise that the party lost five million votes after 1997, four million of them under governments led by Tony Blair, during times of economic growth. Therefore our assessment must go deeper than just this election.  We have to connect with everyone Labour lost touch with.
 
“Two, Labour must be a coalition that includes both middle and low income earners. Labour cannot win by limiting itself to either or taking any part of its electorate for granted. We need a policy that leads the whole of society.
 
“Three, protect investment, defend public services. Bankers, not the public, must pay for the economic crisis. Bankers were paid £8.5bn in bonuses in the four months to April, compared with £7bn during the same period last year. For the bankers, nothing has changed, yet public services are going to be slashed.  And for the British economy to revive investment must be defended.
 
“Four, we must draw a line under the military adventures abroad that revolted many electors and  saw trust break down, even before the expenses scandal. Labour must recognise that the Iraq war was a disaster, making us closer to Bush’s America than Obama’s. The public must know Labour will not make this error again.  
 
“Five, Labour must show it is looking to the interests of the next generation and the future of the planet, which means applying progressive levers of investment and planning to tackle the challenge of climate change. 

“Six, Labour must defend its relationship with the trade unions from any attempt to demolish this vital link with the largest civil society bodies in our country, democratic organisations that enable Labour to counter the vested interests of multi-millionaire donors like Ashcroft. “

 
 
Notes to editors:
*        Analysis of data from the Office for National Statistics shows that bankers were paid £8.5bn in bonuses in the four months to April, compared with £7bn during the same period last year. Pay rose across the industry by £1bn to £12bn. Pay and bonus rises took the combined earnings for the bonus season to £20.5bn compared with £24bn at the height of the boom in 2007. The Guardian, 13/5/10 http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/may/13/bankers-pay-bonuses-surge
*        Speakers at the meeting are Ken Livingstone; Billy Hayes – General Secretary – CWU; Chris McClaughlin – Editor - Tribune; Emily Thornberry MP; Mehdi Hasan – Senior Editor (politics) New Statesman; Lisa Nandy MP
*        The meeting takes place tonight, 17 May 2010, from 7pm-9pm, Congress House, Great Russell, St, London, WC1
*        The meeting is called by CWU, Progressive London; and Tribune

 

 
Post-election meeting: Next Steps for Labour - Speakers Announced Print E-mail
Posted by Progressive London   
Friday, 14 May 2010 14:29

The policies needed for Labour to rebuild a winning electoral coalition will be discussed at “Next Steps for Labour” public meeting on Monday 17 May.
 
Speakers include Ken Livingstone; Billy Hayes - General Secretary, CWU; Chris McClaughlin - Editor, Tribune; Emily Thornberry MP; Mehdi Hasan - New Statesman; Lisa Nandy MP.
 
Ahead of the meeting, which he will address, Ken Livingstone said:
 ''To regain its support the Labour Party must move on from New Labour. Labour lost five million votes since 1997, four million of them under Tony Blair.
 
A new policy direction is needed that unites millions of working class and middle income voters in a winning political coalition for progressive change.
 
The underlying issue in British politics will be who can secure the recovery and protect living standards and public services. To win back its lost support, Labour must offer a progressive alternative to the Con-Lib austerity plans.
 
To rebuild its trust with the electorate, Labour must also acknowledge to the public that the Iraq war was a disastrous mistake."

Read more...
 
Olympics budget - Londoners must not be betrayed Print E-mail
Posted by Progressive London   
Thursday, 13 May 2010 13:05

Last night (12/5/10) on Newsnight the new Conservative culture, media, sport and Olympics minister Jeremy Hunt confirmed that the Olympics budget was not protected from cuts.
 
Former Mayor of London Ken Livingstone said today:
 
"One day into the ConDem government and it is already raising alarm bells for London.

"If Londoners have to pay towards the cost of the Games and bear the inconvenience but then do not get the full benefit due to cuts imposed by George Osborne it will prove deeply unpopular in the capital. 
 
"London's legacy from the Games for London must be protected.

"We secured a binding commitment that Londoners would pay no more than 38p a week towards the Games and in return London would see significant benefits. No one in the Conservative party at the time challenged those undertakings. If they renege on them now London won't forgive them."
 

 
Guest blog: Look at London - Tories are a change for the worse Print E-mail
Posted by Progressive London   
Tuesday, 04 May 2010 14:05

By Nicky Gavron AM and Labour spokesperson on Planning and Housing

If we want an idea of what waking up to a Conservative government might look like, then we need to take stock of what Boris Johnson’s mayoralty shows us about his party. He is, after all, the most high-profile Tory in power in the country.
 
If they are the party of change, as David Cameron tells us, what kind of change can we expect?  
 
On the big issues facing the capital – crime and safety, housing, public transport, and the environment – Boris Johnson has already earmarked cuts to services.
 
The Conservative mayor plans to cut 455 Met police officers and has refused to guarantee safer neighbourhood teams.
 
Under Ken Livingstone’s administration, London reached the highest number of affordable homes built annually since the 1970s. Boris has since scrapped Ken’s target of making half of all new houses affordable and reneged on his promise to build 50,000 affordable homes across London over three years.
 
This is despite being handed £5billion of government money for housing and at a time when 30,000 households are on housing waiting lists in this part of London alone.
 
Cameron’s housing adviser, Cllr Greenhalgh (also leader of Hammersmith & Fulham council), has been collaborating with the Mayor’s advisers and the Tory shadow housing  ministers on disinvesting in building decent homes for Londoners on low incomes, and instead introducing six month tenancies at higher rents.
 
Cameron, Boris Johnson and Town Hall Tories – it’s a triple threat to social housing in London. 

Read more...
 
«StartPrev12345678910NextEnd»

Page 1 of 41
Sign up for email updates
donate